Gemini Father Scorpio Daughter, Articles L

Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image quality. The Leica M10 's physical controls are logical, simple, and offer the right amount of resistance. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. Using it in this factory, a space where I needed to be aware of the timing of things that were happening around me, it just clicked for me. The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. In the run up to buying an M10 Ive been reading a lot of reviews, and have found the M262 is rarely mentioned in them. Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. I so rarely hit the menu button on this camera, it practically doesnt need to be there for my purposes, and Id imagine most users find the same. There is a slight sense that this camera isnt a major model it feels a tiny bit like theres a few too many buttons, and that the body of the camera is a little hollow, but in practice these things go unnoticed. RE: the ISO issue. (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. Equally, if I dont find anything particularly bad to say, thats got to be a good thing too, but it doesnt really help in the process of finding things to say. There is no way to see the chosen ISO until the shot is taken and checking it in the image preview dialogue. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. Pera I think you might be giving a little to much benefit of the doubt there . The sensor is not the same, by the way. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. M262 can be more pleasing in use as lighter with longer lasting battery and a bit quieter than M240. The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. Unsurprisingly, the camera never really made a breakthrough in the video world so perhaps Leica decided it wasn't worth keeping it. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. By Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. One has a brightline window, the other does not. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Display as a link instead, I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. I find it very quick. Yura, I still use both with other M along. He mentioned that he drives older vehicles in order to be able to afford just the kit he wants.Agreed with John Smith. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. You and Roger Hicks. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. If you want video and live view, get the 240. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. Just experimenting, I took a bunch of photos of my mates Canon AE1 this was fun with a rangefinder; I could get used to this! Continue with Recommended Cookies. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. Congratulations on your decision. It was at this early stage that I noticed the first thing that has continued to make me scratch my head throughout the time I used the camera. Functionalism be damned. Pasted as rich text. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. Thankfully with the M10 they've returned to the old system. It doesnt even have any way to connect the Atomos to it. A fetish with the M10 is its simplified menu. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. Can you compare side by side, please? Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. These were live-view using the screen on the back or a slot in electronic viewfinder and video. Hello. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. Yet all the buttons on it and the LCD still have me pining for Leicas. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. Privacy policy. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. I shouldve read the manual! Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. . For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I used the M240 for over two years before upgrading to the M10 a year and a half ago. . For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). Upload or insert images from URL. Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. I need a new 50mm lens. You cannot paste images directly. That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). This happens with the M240 from time to time. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M8 A Year with an Ageing Digital Rangefinder By Rui Hu, Panasonic GM1 Review: A Digital ILC Alternative to the Olympus XA2? With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. Whats the best camera for around $2000? Like most people, I suspect. Image Quality. I remember when live-view first started appearing on interchangeable lens digital cameras. The M9 and CCD sensor. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. When it comes to making video, things are different! The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Of course it didnt. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. dslr . Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. No fuss, just compose and shoot. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. Image: Leica. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. I did eventually get the 1.25 viewfinder magnifier to go with it. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. The price is$5195/4050. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. The sensor is not the same, by the way. Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. I wish I did. I realised Id only used it once in the last 6 months. Well worth seeking out. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? I will investigate that. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. Find out more about 35mmc here. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. For the M240, forget it. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Value for money, incredible quality. Leica M262 - "A Leica M240 in a Leica M9 body" The Leica M 262 that Leica Camera AG surprisingly introduced November 2015 is basically a Leica M 240 in a Leica M9 body. The M Typ 240 can record in Full HD at 24, 25 or 30fps. Clear editor. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. Our camera evaluations and conclusions are based . Yes!! The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. Upload or insert images from URL. The M240 is wide and bulky. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . It was that feeling that having less kit would do me good This became the excuse I needed to change up to the M10. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. How important do you think live view will be for you? I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! Just because something new release does not mean the M9 or even the M8 lost theirs. Thank you for pointing me to that review. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. "It has the same image quality as the Leica M 240" was the . by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! In fact, I pressed the LV (for live-view) button on the camera before I even took a photo. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The ideas with Leica is identities. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. Leica M Typ 240. It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. And sometimes they could come in handy. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. Using the right SD card is key here. If you half press the shutter to leave the menu without pressing SET the ISO remains what it was set to before. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . No. Read full post here: As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. Great article as always! By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. As such, the Leica M262 is possibly better seen as a sidestep rather than a step forward in the Leica lineup. Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! It depends on your needs. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. By It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. I would have bought a 90 Macro lens if I had live view on the camera even though Ive already got a Nikon with 105 Macro. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features.